Highly Flexible Stent and Method of Manufacture

ABSTRACT

Preferred embodiments of a stent with a high degree of flexibility are shown and described. The stent can include a continuous helical winding and at least one bridge. The continuous helical winding has a plurality of circumferential sections that circumscribe a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube. The circumferential sections are spaced apart along the axis. The at least one bridge is configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section. The at least one bridge extends on a plane generally orthogonal with respect to the axis.

This application claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/773,379 filed Feb. 14, 2006 which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

It is known in the medical field to utilize an implantable prosthesis to support a duct or vessel in a mammalian body. One such prosthesis may include a frame-like structure. Such frame-like structures are commonly known as a “stent”, “stent-graft” or “covered stent.” These structures are referred to collectively herein as a “stent” or an “implantable prosthesis.”

The stent or prosthesis can be utilized to support a duct or vessel in the mammalian body that suffers from an abnormal widening (e.g., an aneurysm, vessel contraction or lesion such as a stenosis or occlusion), or an abnormal narrowing (e.g., a stricture). Stents are also utilized widely in the urethra, esophagus, biliary tract, intestines, arteries, veins, as well as peripheral vessels. The stent can be delivered via a small incision on a host body. Hence, the use of stents as a minimally-invasive surgical procedure has become widely accepted.

Previously developed stents for use in the biliary, venous, and arterial systems have been of two broad classes: balloon-expanded and self-expanding. In both of these classes, stents have been made by different techniques, including forming from wire and machining from a hollow tube. Such machining can be done by photo-chemical etching, laser-cutting, stamping, piercing, or other material-removal processes. Other manufacturing techniques have been proposed, such as vacuum or chemical deposition of material or forming a tube of machined flat material, but those “exotic” methods have not been widely commercialized.

One common form of stent is configured as a series of essentially identical rings connected together to form a lattice-like framework that defines a tubular framework. The series of rings may or may not have connecting linkages between the adjacent rings. One example does not utilize any connecting linkages between adjacent rings as it relies upon a direct connection from one ring to the next ring. It is believed that more popular examples utilize connecting linkages between adjacent rings, which can be seen in stent products offered by various companies in the marketplace.

All of the above stent examples utilize a biocompatible metal alloy (e.g., stainless steel, Nitinol or Elgiloy). The most common metal alloy utilized by these examples is Nitinol, which has strong shape memory characteristics so that Nitinol self-expands when placed in the duct or vessel of a mammalian body at normal body temperature. In addition to self-expansion, these stents utilize a series of circular rings placed adjacent to each other to maintain an appropriate longitudinal spacing between each rings. Other examples are shown and described in U.S. Patent Publications 2004/0267353 and 2003/055485, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,059. Examples which use a helical configuration are shown and described, to identify a few, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,117,165; 6,488,703; 6,042,597; 5,906,639; 6,053,940; 6,013,854; 6,348,065; 6,923,828; 6,059,808; 6,238,409; 6,656,219; 6,053,940; 6,013,854; and 5,800,456.

A need is recognized for a stent that maintains the patency of a vessel with the ability to adapt to the tortuous anatomy of the host by being highly flexible while being loadable into a delivery catheter of sufficiently small profile and easily deliverable to target site in the vessel or duct by having the ability to navigate tortuous ducts or vessels.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The embodiments described herein relate to various improvements of the structure of an implantable stent that embodies a helical winding.

One aspect includes a stent with a continuous helical winding and at least one bridge. The continuous helical winding has a plurality of circumferential sections that circumscribe a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube. The circumferential sections are spaced apart along the axis. The at least one bridge is configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section. The at least one bridge extends on a plane generally orthogonal with respect to the axis.

In yet another aspect, a stent is provided that includes a continuous helical winding and at least one bridge. The continuous helical winding has a plurality of circumferential sections that circumscribe a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube. The circumferential sections are spaced apart along the axis. The at least one bridge is configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section. Each circumferential section has undulations disposed about the tube. The undulations have at least one strut connected to the bridge where the at least one strut has a length greater than a length of other struts unconnected to the bridge.

In a further aspect, a stent is provided that includes a continuous helical winding and at least one bridge. The continuous helical winding has a plurality of circumferential sections that circumscribe a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube. The circumferential sections are spaced apart along the axis, and each circumferential section has undulations disposed about the tube. The at least one bridge is configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section. The at least one bridge extends on a plane generally orthogonal with respect to the axis, and the bridge has a width greater than a width of any struts that define the undulations.

In yet a further aspect, a stent is provided that includes a continuous helical winding, at least one bridge, and at least one annular ring. The continuous helical winding has a plurality of circumferential sections circumscribing a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube. The circumferential sections are spaced apart along the axis. The at least one bridge is configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section, the at least one bridge extending on a plane generally orthogonal with respect to the axis. The at least one annular ring is connected to one of the first and second ends of the continuous helical winding.

In another aspect, a stent is provided that includes a continuous helical winding, and at least one bridge. The helical winding circumscribes a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube having a length of about 60 millimeters and an outer diameter of about 6 millimeters. The at least one bridge connects portions of the helical winding so that a force required to displace a portion of the helical winding between two fixed portions of the winding located about 30 millimeters apart and disposed in a Lumminexx® III sheath is less than 3.2 Newton of force for a displacement of about 3 millimeters along an axis orthogonal to the axis.

In a different aspect, a method of loading a stent into a generally tubular sheath for delivery into a biological host is provided. The method can be achieved by providing a stent including a continuous helical winding having a plurality of circumferential sections circumscribing a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube, the circumferential sections being spaced apart along the axis where each of the circumferential sections includes repeating struts, and a plurality of bridges, each bridge is configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section, the at least one bridge extending on a plane generally orthogonal with respect to the axis, and compressing the stent having an outside diameter of approximately 6 millimeters to fit within the generally tubular sheath that has an inside diameter of approximately 2 millimeters (about 6 French) without any of the struts of the stent crossing each other inside the sheath,

In another aspect, a method of loading a stent into a generally tubular sheath for delivery into a biological host is provided. The method can be achieved by providing undulations configured in a helical path about a longitudinal axis and configured in a first tubular shape in an expanded configuration, locating the undulations and bridges interconnecting the undulations in a second tubular shape having an inside diameter with respect to the axis of approximately 6 French and in a compressed configuration smaller than the first tubular shape, and preventing physical interference between portions of the undulations and bridges in the compressed configuration.

These and other embodiments, features and advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art when taken with reference to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that are first briefly described.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the invention.

FIG. 1 is a side view of a helical type stent of the preferred embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a portion of the stent of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a close-up, perspective view of the stent of FIG. 2.

FIG. 3A is a close-up, perspective view of an alternate embodiment of a bridge connection illustrated in FIG. 3.

FIG. 4 is a close-up side view of a bridge connection of the stent of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5A is a close-up partial side view of an end portion of the stent of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5B is a close-up partial side view of an end portion of the stent of FIG. 1 in an unexpanded configuration.

FIG. 6 is a close-up partial side view illustrating the loading forces and distortion of an alternative embodiment of the bridge connection.

FIG. 7 is a close-up partial side view of an embodiment of the stent in an unexpanded configuration.

FIG. 8 is a side view of a portion of an alternative stent to the stent of FIG. 1.

FIG. 9 illustrates a testing stand to determine flexibility of the preferred stent in a delivery catheter.

FIG. 10 is a side view of a portion of another alternative stent to the stent of FIG. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings, in which like elements in different drawings are identically numbered. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict selected embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The detailed description illustrates by way of example, not by way of limitation, the principles of the invention. This description will clearly enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and describes several embodiments, adaptations, variations, alternatives and uses of the invention, including what is presently believed to be the best mode of carrying out the invention.

As used herein, the terms “about” or “approximately” for any numerical values or ranges indicate a suitable dimensional tolerance that allows the part or collection of components to function for its intended purpose as described herein. Also, as used herein, the terms “patient”, “host” and “subject” refer to any human or animal subject and are not intended to limit the systems or methods to human use, although use of the subject invention in a human patient represents a preferred embodiment.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, a stent 100 is shown having a tubular shape and a first end 10, a second end 12, an intermediate portion 14, and a longitudinal axis 16. The intermediate portion 14 includes a continuous helical winding 18. The winding 18 has a plurality of circumferential sections 20 (identified as 20 a-20 g in FIG. 1) that join together end-to-end and circumscribe the axis 16 from the first end 10 to the second end 12, with the continuation of each circumferential section 20 along the path of the helical winding 18 represented with dashed lines in FIG. 1. In FIGS. 1, 2, 8, and 10, the portions of the stent 100 (or stents 200 or 300) in the background of the figure are not shown in detail, for clarity and to clearly show identical features already presented in the foreground of the figure. The circumferential sections 20 are longitudinally spaced apart along the axis 16 and disposed 360 degrees about the axis 16. The axial distances between adjacent circumferential sections 20 define spacing 22, and the spacing 22 is shown in FIG. 1 with the same dashed lines that represent the continuation of the helical winding 18 for each circumferential section 20 in the background of the figure. The spacing 22 of each circumferential section 20 defines a helical angle 24 relative to a plane collinear with the axis 16 (as shown) or relative to an orthogonal plane intersecting the axis 16, with each circumferential section 20 having a helical angle on a first-end facing side and a second-end facing side. Although only one helical winding 18 is illustrated in FIG. 1, more that one helical winding 18 can be employed in the stent 100. For example, a helical winding with a first helical angle can be connected or coupled with another helical winding that has a different second helical angle. Alternatively, the helical winding 18 of FIG. 1 can be utilized as a central portion of the intermediate portion 14 and the helical winding 218 of the stent 200 illustrated in FIG. 8 can be utilized proximate each end of the intermediate portion 14, and vice versa.

The stent 100 includes at least one bridge 26 configured to connect one circumferential section 20 to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section 20. The bridge 26 extends generally circumferentially around the axis 16 on a generally orthogonal plane with respect to the axis 16. That is, the bridge 26 forms a circumferential connector or bridge member (i.e., “circumferential bridge”) between circumferential sections 20 of the helical winding 18. Preferably, there are a plurality of bridges 26 interconnecting the circumferential sections 20 to adjacent circumferential sections 20.

As illustrated in FIG. 3, in the intermediate portion 14, each circumferential section 20 includes a plurality of struts 28 joined together by strut vertices 30 and bridge vertices 31 disposed at ends of the struts 28. The strut vertices 30 connect two struts 28 together, and the bridge vertices 31 connect one or two struts 28 and a bridge 26 together. The bridge vertices 31 are larger than the strut vertices 30 in order to accommodate the connection of the bridges 26 to the struts 28. The bridges 26 connect the bridge vertices 31 in one circumferential section 20 to the bridge vertices 31 in an adjacent circumferential section 20. The bridges 26 provide a circumferential offset, equal to the length of the bridge 26, between connected bridge vertices 31 that approximately face each other across the spacing 22 between adjacent circumferential sections 20. Upon expansion of the stent 100, the bridges 26 maintain an offset orientation between the bridge vertices 31, so that the strut vertices 30 and bridge vertices 31 of one circumferential section 20 do not abut or near the opposing strut vertices 30 or bridge vertices 31 of an adjacent circumferential section 20. Also, when the stent 100 is bent slightly and forced to conform to a curve, the strut vertices 30 and bridge vertices 31 disposed on the inside path of the curve will move towards each other and close the spacing 22 between adjacent circumferential sections 20 (and possibly continue moving towards each other so that one circumferential section 20 moves into the path of the helical winding 18 occupied in part by another circumferential section 20), but avoid or minimize direct contact or interference because the bridges 26 cause the strut vertices 30 and bridge vertices 31 of one circumferential section 20 to interdigitate with those of another circumferential section 20. This interdigitation of the circumferential sections 20 allows the stent 100 to bend easily without interference between struts 28, strut vertices 30, and bridge vertices 31 on adjacent circumferential sections 20 of the helical winding 18. That is, each of the bridges 26 is configured so that the end of the bridge 26 connected to one bridge vertex 31 is circumferentially aligned with the other end of the bridge 26 connected to another bridge vertex 31 on a plane that is orthogonal to the axis 16, whether the stent 100 is in an expanded or unexpanded configuration. As illustrated in FIG. 3A, an alternative bridge 27 a can be non-linear, but one end of the bridge 27 b remains circumferentially aligned with the other end of the bridge 27 c (illustrated by a dashed line between bridge ends 27 b and 27 c) in a plane orthogonal to the axis 16. As such, the bridge 26 is not required to be linear as illustrated herein but can include curved, zig-zag, meandering curves, sinusoidal, or curvilinear configurations as long as the end points connecting to opposing bridge vertices 31 are aligned with the circumference of a tube defined by the stent 100. Alternatively, as illustrated in FIG. 3A, the bridges 26 of the various embodiments can also provide an extension 27 d that permits comparatively slight extension of the stent 100 in the direction of the axis 16 or beyond the radial periphery of the stent 100 defined by the expansion of the circumferential sections 20, as described and shown U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/216,222; 11/216,228; 11/216,293; 11/216,362; and 11/216,554 filed on Aug. 31, 2005, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

While providing these aforementioned advantages, the circumferential bridges 26 provide for a more generally even expansion of the stent 100 because some of the bridges 26 are disposed away from the expanding portions of the circumferential sections 20 that define the helical winding 18. As illustrated in FIG. 3, in the preferred embodiments, the circumferential sections 20 have undulations that are formed by the generally linear struts 28 coupled together at the strut vertices 30 or bridge vertices 31, which are deformed during expansion and compression of the stent 100. Where the bridge 26 a is coupled to struts 28 a and 28 b in FIG. 3, the bridge vertex 31 a is sufficiently rigid so that it isolates any deformation of the struts 28 a and 28 b (during expansion of the stent 100, for example) from the bridge 26 a, so that bridge 26 a is not or only minimally deformed. Preferably, the stent 100 is a Nitinol self-expanding stent of approximately 6 mm final diameter, and the bridge 26 is approximately 100 microns wide in the direction of the axis 16, approximately 200 microns thick in the radial direction from the axis 16, and approximately 130 microns long in the circumferential direction between the bridge vertices 31. The bridge vertices 31, illustrated in FIG. 4, are approximately 90 microns wide in the direction of axis 16, approximately 200 microns thick in the radial direction from the axis 16, and approximately 1500 microns long in the circumferential direction around axis 16. Other materials can be used instead of Nitinol, such as, for example, weak shape memory metals (e.g., stainless steel, platinum, Elgiloy), shape memory polymers, bioresorbable metals and polymers.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, it is noted that the number of bridges 26 and struts 28 can be varied. In one embodiment, the number of struts 28 above and below any bridges 26 (within a single arcuate undulation section 32) can be the same. An arcuate undulation section 32 is a series of struts 28 and strut vertices 30 extending between two bridge vertices 31 on a single circumferential section 20. For example, with reference to circumferential section 20 c in FIG. 1, bridge vertices 31 a and 31 b have five struts 28 therebetween (which define five undulations in the arcuate undulation section 32 a). Bridges 26 c and 26 d join the arcuate undulation section 32 a to arcuate undulation sections 32 in adjacent circumferential sections 20 b and 20 d, respectively, which are spaced at a predetermined distance (spacing 22) from circumferential section 20 c. In particular, five struts 28 are disposed along any one of the arcuate undulation sections 32 between any one bridge 26 and another next bridge 26 in the intermediate portion 14, in a circumferential direction that is either clockwise or counter-clockwise around the axis 16. It is believed that a design having equal number struts 28 provides advantageous characteristics with regard to flexibility and strength. In the preferred embodiments, the number of struts 28 in the clockwise or counterclockwise circumferential directions can range from three to nine, inclusive. Alternatively, the number of struts 28 in one circumferential direction can be different from the number of struts 28 in the other circumferential direction. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 8, there are seven struts 28 disposed between bridge vertex 31 c and bridge vertex 31 d in the circumferential counter-clockwise direction identified by arrow 34 and five struts 28 disposed between bridge vertex 31 c and bridge vertex 31 e in the circumferential clockwise direction identified by arrow 36. In the preferred embodiments, a pattern of three struts 28 in the counter-clockwise direction and five struts 28 in the clockwise direction from a single bridge vertex 31 (a three-five pattern), a five-five pattern, or a five-seven pattern are utilized.

With reference to FIG. 7, a portion of the stent 100 is shown in a compressed and unimplanted configuration. In order to discuss the various features of the struts 28 and bridges 26, the following definition of strut length is used. A “strut length” is the length of a strut 28 from a center 38 of a radius of curvature of one end of the strut 28 (at a strut vertex 30 or bridge vertex 31) to another center 38 of a radius of curvature located on the other end of the strut 28 (at a strut vertex 30 or bridge vertex 31). As such, as illustrated in FIG. 7, the strut length of the strut 28 c (extending between two strut vertices 30) is strut length 40 a, the strut length of the strut 28 d (extending between a strut vertex 30 and a portion 42 of a bridge vertex 31) is strut length 40 b, and the strut length of strut 28 e (extending between a strut vertex 30 and a portion 43 of a bridge vertex 31) is strut length 40 c. Portion 43 is disposed more closely to the bridge 26 than portion 42. Using this definition, it can be seen that strut length 40 c is greater than strut length 40 b, and that strut length 40 b is greater than strut length 40 a. In an alternative embodiment, the strut lengths of sequential struts 28 in a circumferential section 20 can alternate between a relatively short strut 28 and a relatively long strut 28 to allow for the axial advancement of the helical winding 18.

Further, the use of bridges 26 to connect adjacent circumferential sections 20 is not limited to the configuration illustrated in the figures but can include other configurations where the bridge 26 is on a plane obliquely intersecting the axis 16 or generally parallel to the axis 16. For example, as shown in FIG. 10, an alternative stent 300 includes an axial bridge 44 extending substantially parallel with respect to the axis 16 of the stent. Also illustrated is a wave type spring bridge 45 (e.g., curvilinear in profile), an oblique bridge 46 extending obliquely with respect to an axis extending parallel to the axis 16, and a long bridge 47 extending far enough between bridge vertices 31 so that there is a “bypassed” strut vertex 30 or another bridge vertex passed by and not engaged with the long bridge 47. As also illustrated in FIG. 10, the stent 300 can utilize a combination of bridge types. Alternatively, the bridges 26, 44, 45, 46, or 47 can directly connect a peak 48 of one circumferential section 20 to another peak 48 of an adjacent circumferential section, as illustrated by oblique bridge 46. In yet another alternative, the bridges 26, 44, 45, 46, or 47 can connect a peak 48 to a trough 50 of an adjacent circumferential section 20, as illustrated by axial bridge 44 and wave type spring bridge 45. In a further alternative, the bridges 26, 44, 45, 46, or 47 can connect a trough 50 to a trough 50, as illustrated by long bridge 47. Moreover, the undulations of the arcuate undulation section 32 can be wave-like in pattern. The wave-like pattern can also be generally sinusoidal in that the pattern can have the general form of a sine wave, whether or not such wave can be defined by a mathematical function. Alternatively, any wave-like form can be employed so long as it has amplitude and displacement. For example, a square wave, saw tooth wave, or any applicable wave-like pattern defined by the struts where the struts have substantially equal lengths or unequal lengths. Also the stents 100, 200, or 300 can be stents that are bare, coated, covered, encapsulated, bio-resorbable or any portion of such stents.

It is appreciated that the struts 28 and circumferential sections 20 in the intermediate portion 14 of the stent 100 are supported directly or indirectly on both axial sides (the sides facing spacing 22) by bridges 26 because they fall between other adjacent circumferential sections 20. However, the axially endmost turns of the helical winding 18 (the axially endmost circumferential sections 20, such as circumferential section 20 a in FIG. 1) are supported by bridges 26 only on the side of the circumferential section 20 facing another circumferential section 20, and these endmost circumferential sections 20 lack bridges 26 on the sides that do not face an adjacent circumferential section 20, which can affect the proper and even orientation of the struts 28 in these endmost circumferential sections 20 during the contraction or expansion of the stent 100. Any distortions attributable to this one-sided bridge 26 arrangement are small and are usually negligible. However, when markers are attached to the endmost turns of the winding 18 (the endmost circumferential sections 20) with extensions, the lengths of the markers and the extensions are believed to amplify any distortion of the endmost turns. This unevenness is particularly noticeable in a helical winding because the struts are generally of unequal length in order to provide a square-cut end to the stent, and any small distortions of the endmost turns are amplified to differing degrees by the different lengths of marker extensions.

There are several effects of the marker movement referred to above. Cosmetically, the stent can be given a non-uniform appearance that is objectionable to a clinician. If the distortions are large enough, there can be interference between or overlapping of the markers. These distortions can arise during manufacture of the stent, when the pre-form of a self-expanded stent is expanded to its final size. Similar distortions can arise when a finished stent is compressed for insertion into a delivery system, or when a stent is in place in vivo but held in a partially-compressed shape by the anatomy.

Referring to FIGS. 1-3 and particularly 5A-5B, at the first end 10 and second end 12 of the stent 100 there are provided markers 60 extending from the strut vertices 30 of the helical winding 18 with extensions 61. Reinforcing or connecting structures 62 are formed in the stent pre-form (i.e., in the initial manufacturing state of the stent 100) and stabilize the shape and orientation of markers 60 during the expansion of the stent 100 and during the manufacture of the stent 100. It is believed that these connecting structures 62 serve the additional function of improving the stability of the markers 60 when the stent 100 is collapsed for the purpose of delivering the stent to a location within a living body. Further, these connecting structures 62 are also believed to improve the stability of the stent 100 in vivo by improving the resistance to deformation of the markers 60.

With the use of the connecting structures 62, the distortions at the ends 10 and 12 of the stent 100 can be reduced or mostly eliminated. Specifically, the connecting structure 62 is formed by an annular ring 64 that includes a series of end struts 66 and bending segments 68 (similar to the struts 28 and strut and bridge vertices 30 and 31) and is connected between adjacent markers 60 in order to present reactive forces to resist distortion from the expansion and compression of the struts 28. Because these end struts 66 are connected at an axially outer end of the markers 60, they present the greatest possible leverage to maintain the longitudinal axial alignment of the markers 60 and extensions 61 while presenting radial compressive and expansion forces similar to those of the struts 28. These end struts 66 are cut into the stent pre-form at the same time that the strut 28 and bridge 26 pattern of the stent 100 is cut, typically using a laser cutting apparatus or by a suitable forming technique (e.g., etching or EDM). These end struts 66 (along with bending segments 68) then tend to hold the markers 60 and the extensions 61 in parallel or generally in longitudinal axial alignment with the axis 16 when the stent pre-form is expanded during the manufacturing process.

Once the stent pre-form has been expanded, the end struts 66 can be either removed or left in place to form part of the finished stent 100. If it is desired to remove the end struts 66, then the end struts 66 can be designed with sacrificial points, i.e., there can be notches or other weakening features in the body of the end struts 66 where the end struts 66 attach to the markers 60, so that the end struts 66 can be easily removed from the stent 100 by cutting or breaking the end struts 66 at the sacrificial points.

Alternatively, the end struts 66 can be designed so that they remain part of the stent 100. In this case, there would be no artificially weakened sacrificial point at the connection to the markers 60. After the stent pre-form is expanded, the final manufacturing operations would be completed, including cleaning, heat-treating, deburring, polishing, and final cleaning or coating. The resulting stent can then have the end struts 66 in place as an integral part of the stent 100 structure.

In the preferred embodiment, shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, the markers 60 are approximately 620 microns wide in the circumferential direction and approximately 1200 microns long in the direction of axis 16. Most preferably, the markers 60 are unitary with the extension 61 of the helical winding 18, are generally rectangular in configuration, and can have the inside surface of each marker 60 curved to conform to the tubular form of the stent 100. Alternatively, the markers 60 can be formed as spoon-shaped markers joined to the extensions 61 by welding, bonding, soldering or swaging to portions or ends of the extensions 61. In a further alternative, materials can be removed from either the luminal or abluminal surface of the markers 60 to provide a void, and a radiopaque material can be joined to or filled into the void. The markers 60 can be mounted at the end of extensions 61. The end struts 66 joining the markers 60 can be approximately 80 microns wide in the circumferential direction and approximately 1500 microns long in the direction of the axis 16 when the stent 100 is in a compressed state, as illustrated in FIG. 5B. In the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 5A and 5B, there are four end struts 66 between two adjacent markers 60. In the preferred embodiments, the rectangular marker 60 can have its length extending generally parallel to the axis 16 and its circumferential width being greater than two times the width of any strut 28 (i.e., circumferential width in the compressed configuration). In one embodiment, the circumferential width of at least one strut 28 is approximately 65 microns and the circumferential width of the at least one strut 28 is approximately 80-95% of a width of the bridge 26 in the direction of the axis 16.

Referring to FIG. 5B, the structure of the end struts 66 that connect to the markers 60 are preferably provided with a slight curvature 70 (and corresponding curvature on the markers 60) to provide for strain relief as the end struts 66 are expanded.

In an alternative embodiment, the connecting structure 62 includes two end struts 66 (instead of the four of the preferred embodiment) of approximately 90 microns wide in the circumferential direction (when the stent 100 is in the compressed configuration) and approximately 2000 microns long in the direction of the axis 16. It should be noted that four end struts 66 can be utilized when, for example, no marker 60 is used or only a minimal number of markers 60 are needed. The markers 60 in the embodiments are preferably approximately 620 microns wide in the circumferential direction and approximately 1200 microns long in the direction of the axis 16. The markers 60 are preferably mounted on the extensions 61 that are approximately 200 microns wide in the circumferential direction and approximately 2000 microns long in the direction of the axis 16. Preferably, the stent 100, in the form of a bare stent, is manufactured from Nitinol tubing approximately 200 microns thick and having an approximate 1730 micron outside diameter, and is preferably designed to have an approximately 6 mm finished, expanded, and unimplanted outside diameter.

There are several features of the stent 100 that are believed to be heretofore unavailable in the art. Consequently, the state of the art is advanced by virtue of these features, which are discussed below.

First, as noted previously, the continuous helical winding 18 can have a plurality of circumferential sections 20. A plurality of bridges 26 extend on a plane generally orthogonal with respect to the axis 16 to connect the circumferential sections 20. By this configuration of the circumferential bridges 26 for the helical winding 18, a more uniform expansion of the stent 100 is achieved.

Second, each of the circumferential sections 20 can be configured as arcuate undulation sections 32 (FIGS. 1 and 2) disposed about the axis 16. The arcuate undulation sections 32 can have bridges 26 with struts 28 connected thereto so that the struts 28 connecting to the bridges 26 have a length greater than a length of other struts 28 that are not connected directly to the bridges 26. With reference to FIG. 7, it is noted that the struts 28 can have a strut length 40 c that is greater than a strut length 40 b, and a strut length 40 b that is greater than a strut length 40 a.

Third, the bridge 26 can be connected to the adjacent arcuate undulation section 32 at respective locations other than the peaks 48 of the adjacent arcuate undulation section 32. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, the bridge 26 has an axial width selected so that the edges of the bridge 26 form an offset 71 that sets the bridge 26 slightly back from the outermost edge 31 f of the bridge vertices 31. By virtue of such arrangement, distortion is believed to be reduced in the struts 28, and substantially reduced at the struts 28 connecting directly to the bridge vertices 31. Specifically, FIG. 6 illustrates the increased bending strains placed on the stressed struts 28 f when the bridge 26 is stressed by bending or by torsion of the stent 100. In the example illustrated in FIG. 6, a clockwise force is applied in the direction of the arrows 72 which results from the bending or torsion of the stent 100, and the greatest stresses are believed to be developed at high-stress points 76 where the stressed struts 28 f connect to the bridge vertices 31. It is believed that distortion of the strut pattern can be expected to result in increased local strains, which can cause small regions of the strut pattern to experience higher than normal strains. It is also believed that such increased strains can lead to premature failure in vivo. Because the high-stress points 76 in the preferred embodiments are located away from the bridge 26 by a distance corresponding to the circumferential width of the bridge vertex 31, as illustrated in FIG. 6, localized strains at the bridge 26 connecting points 74 (where the bridge 26 connects to the bridge vertices 31) are less than those experienced at the high-stress points 76. In addition, the struts 28 can have linear segments, curved segments or a combination of curved and linear segments. Also, by virtue of the circumferential bridges 26, the struts 28 can have a curved configuration between peaks 48 of a winding 18 as illustrated, for example, in FIG. 6.

Fourth, in the embodiment where a bridge 26 extends on a plane generally orthogonal with respect to the axis 16, there is at least one annular ring 64 connected to one of the first and second ends 10 and 12 of the continuous helical winding 18. The annular ring 64 is believed to reduce distortions to the markers 60 proximate the end or ends of the helical winding 18.

Fifth, in the preferred embodiment, where the stent 100 includes a continuous helical winding 18 and a plurality of circumferential sections 20 defining a tube having an axial length of about 60 millimeters and an outer diameter of about 6 millimeters, at least one bridge 26 is configured to connect two circumferential sections 20 together so that the force required to displace a portion of the stent 100 between two fixed points located about 30 millimeters apart is less than 3.2 Newton for a displacement of about 3 millimeters along an axis orthogonal to the axis 16 of the stent 100. In particular, as illustrated in FIG. 9, the stent 100 is loaded in carrier sheaths 80 made of PEBAX, where the stent 100 is supported by an inner catheter 82 and outer catheter 84. The outer catheter 84 has an inner diameter of about 1.6 millimeters. Both the inner and outer catheters 82 and 84 are commercially available 6 French catheters under the trade name Luminexx® III manufactured by Angiomed GmbH & Co., Medizintechnik KG of Germany, and available from C. R. Bard, Inc. of Murray Hill, N.J. The two catheters 82 and 84 with the stent 100 in between are placed on a 3-point bending jig where the outer catheter 84 is supported at two locations spaced apart at distance L of about 30 millimeters. A load F1 is placed on the stent 100 proximate the center of the distance L and the force required to bend the catheters 82 and 84 and the stent 100 over a displacement D1 of about 3 millimeters is measured. For the stent 100 of the preferred embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the force required to achieve a displacement D1 of 3 millimeters is less than 3.2 Newtons. As compared with a known helical stent (sold under the trade name Lifestent® and having an outer diameter of approximately 6 millimeters and a length of about 40 millimeters), using the same testing configuration, the force required to displace the known stent in a Luminexx® III catheter sheath over a distance D1 of approximately 3 millimeters is approximately 3.2 Newtons or greater. It is believed that the lower the force required to displace the stent (when contained in catheters 82 and 84) a distance D1 (of about 3 millimeters), the better the ability of the stent and the catheters to navigate tortuous anatomy. By requiring less than 3.2 Newtons force in this test, the preferred embodiment stent 100 is believed to be highly flexible during delivery and implantation, as compared to known stents and delivery systems, and this high flexibility facilitates the ability of the clinician to navigate a duct or vessel necessary to deliver and implant the stent. In the particular embodiment tested, the force F1 for stent 100 was approximately 1.7 Newtons for a 6 French Luminexx® III catheter.

Sixth, by virtue of the structures described herein, an advantageous technique to load a helical stent 100 is provided that does not have physical interference between arcuate undulation sections 32 and bridges 26 in the compressed configuration of the stent 100 in a generally tubular sheath from an inside diameter of approximately 6 millimeters to the compressed stent 100 configuration of approximately 2 millimeters (6 French). Specifically, where a stent is utilized with approximately 48 arcuate undulation sections 32 (which include the struts 28) in each circumferential section 20, and 9 bridges 26 for connection to adjacent circumferential sections 20, it has been advantageously determined that the stent 100 does not require a transition portion and a tubular end zone, as is known in the art. In particular, the method can be achieved by utilization of a physical embodiment of the stent 100 (e.g., FIGS. 1-5) and compressing the stent 100. The stent 100 has an outside diameter of approximately 6 millimeters that must be compressed to fit within the generally tubular sheath 80 that has an outside diameter of approximately 2 millimeters (6 French) and an inside diameter of approximately 1.6 millimeters, without any of the struts 28 of the stent 100 crossing each other when compressed and inserted into the sheath 80. In other words, in the expanded unimplanted configuration of the stent 100, none of the struts 28 and bridges 26 physically interfere with, i.e., overlap or cross, other struts 28 or bridges 26 of the stent 100. The stent 100 can be compressed, without the use of transition strut segments (or the use of the annular rings 64) at the axial ends of the helical winding 18, to a smaller outer diameter of about 3 millimeters or less (and preferably less than 2 millimeters) where the inner surfaces of the struts 28 and bridges 26 remain substantially contiguous without physical interference of one strut 28 with another strut 28 or with a bridge 26.

Bio-active agents can be added to the stent (e.g., either by a coating or via a carrier medium such as resorbable polymers) for delivery to the host vessel or duct. The bio-active agents can also be used to coat the entire stent. A coating can include one or more non-genetic therapeutic agents, genetic materials and cells and combinations thereof as well as other polymeric coatings.

Non-genetic therapeutic agents include anti-thrombogenic agents such as heparin, heparin derivatives, urokinase, and PPack (dextrophenylalanine proline arginine chloromethylketone); anti-proliferative agents such as enoxaprin, angiopeptin, or monoclonal antibodies capable of blocking smooth muscle cell proliferation, hirudin, and acetylsalicylic acid; anti-inflammatory agents such as dexamethasone, prednisolone, corticosterone, budesonide, estrogen, sulfasalazine, and mesalamine; antineoplastic/antiproliferative/anti-miotic agents such as paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, vinblastine, vincristine, epothilones, endostatin, angiostatin and thymidine kinase inhibitors; anesthetic agents such as lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine; anti-coagulants, an RGD peptide-containing compound, heparin, antithrombin compounds, platelet receptor antagonists, anti-thrombin anticodies, anti-platelet receptor antibodies, aspirin, prostaglandin inhibitors, platelet inhibitors and tick antiplatelet peptides; vascular cell growth promotors such as growth factor inhibitors, growth factor receptor antagonists, transcriptional activators, and translational promotors; vascular cell growth inhibitors such as growth factor inhibitors, growth factor receptor antagonists, transcriptional repressors, translational repressors, replication inhibitors, inhibitory antibodies, antibodies directed against growth factors, bifunctional molecules consisting of a growth factor and a cytotoxin, bifunctional molecules consisting of an antibody and a cytotoxin; cholesterol-lowering agents; vasodilating agents; and agents which interfere with endogenous vascoactive mechanisms.

Genetic materials include anti-sense DNA and RNA, DNA coding for, anti-sense RNA, tRNA or rRNA to replace defective or deficient endogenous molecules, angiogenic factors including growth factors such as acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor alpha and beta, platelet-derived endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, tumor necrosis factor alpha, hepatocyte growth factor and insulin like growth factor, cell cycle inhibitors including CD inhibitors, thymidine kinase (“TK”) and other agents useful for interfering with cell proliferation the family of bone morphogenic proteins (“BMPs”), BMP-2, BMP-3, BMP-4, BMP-5, BMP-6 (Vgr-1), BMP-7 (OP-1), BMP-8, BMP-9, BMP-10, BMP-1, BMP-12, BMP-13, BMP-14, BMP-15, and BMP-16. Desirable BMP's are any of BMP-2, BMP-3, BMP-4, BMP-5, BMP-6 and BMP-7. These dimeric proteins can be provided as homodimers, heterodimers, or combinations thereof, alone or together with other molecules. Alternatively or, in addition, molecules capable of inducing an upstream or downstream effect of a BMP can be provided. Such molecules include any of the “hedgehog” proteins, or the DNAs encoding them.

Cells can be of human origin (autologous or allogeneic) or from an animal source (xenogeneic), genetically engineered if desired to deliver proteins of interest at the deployment site. The cells can be provided in a delivery media. The delivery media can be formulated as needed to maintain cell function and viability.

Suitable polymer coating materials include polycarboxylic acids, cellulosic polymers, including cellulose acetate and cellulose nitrate, gelatin, polyvinylpyrrolidone, cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyanhydrides including maleic anhydride polymers, polyamides, polyvinyl alcohols, copolymers of vinyl monomers such as EVA, polyvinyl ethers, polyvinyl aromatics, polyethylene oxides, glycosaminoglycans, polysaccharides, polyesters including polyethylene terephthalate, polyacrylamides, polyethers, polyether sulfone, polycarbonate, polyalkylenes including polypropylene, polyethylene and high molecular weight polyethylene, halogenated polyalkylenes including polytetrafluoroethylene, polyurethanes, polyorthoesters, proteins, polypeptides, silicones, siloxane polymers, polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, polycaprolactone, polyhydroxybutyrate valerate and blends and copolymers thereof, coatings from polymer dispersions such as polyurethane dispersions (for example, BAYHDROL® fibrin, collagen and derivatives thereof, polysaccharides such as celluloses, starches, dextrans, alginates and derivatives, hyaluronic acid, squalene emulsions. Polyacrylic acid, available as HYDROPLUS® (from Boston Scientific Corporation of Natick, Mass.), and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,091,205, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, is particularly desirable. Even more desirable is a copolymer of polylactic acid and polycaprolactone.

The preferred stents can also be used as the framework for a vascular graft. Suitable coverings include nylon, collagen, PTFE and expanded PTFE, polyethylene terephthalate, KEVLAR® polyaramid, and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. More generally, any known graft material can be used including synthetic polymers such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethane, polyglycolic acid, polyesters, polyamides, their mixtures, blends and copolymers.

In the preferred embodiments, some or all of the bridges 26 can be bio-resorbed while leaving the undulating strut 28 configuration essentially unchanged. In other embodiments, however, the entire stent 100 can be resorbed in stages by a suitable coating over the resorbable material. For example, the bridges 26 can resorb within a short time period after implantation, such as, for example, 30 days. The remaining helical stent framework (made of a resorbable material such as metal or polymers) can thereafter resorb in a subsequent time period, such as, for example, 90 days to 2 years from implantation.

Markers 60 can be provided for all of the embodiments described herein. The marker 60 can be formed from the same material as the stent 100 as long as the material is radiographic or radiopaque. The marker material can also be formed from gold, tantalum, platinum for example. The marker 60 can be formed from a marker material different from the material used to form another marker 60.

The stents described herein can be, with appropriate modifications, delivered to an implantation site in a host with the delivery devices described and shown in U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2005/0090890 or 2002/0183826, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,939,352 or 6,866,669.

Although the preferred embodiments have been described in relation to a frame work that define a tube using wire like members, other variations are within the scope of the invention. For example, the frame work can define different tubular sections with different outer diameters, the frame work can define a tubular section coupled to a conic section, the frame work can define a single cone, and the wire-like members can be in cross-sections other than circular such as, for example, rectangular, square, or polygonal.

Even though various aspects of the preferred embodiments have been described as self-expanding Nitinol stents suitable for use in the common bile duct or superficial femoral artery, it should be apparent to a person skilled in the art that these improvements can be applied to self-expanding stents of all sizes and made from any suitable material. Further, such stents can be applied to any body lumen where it is desired to place a structure to maintain patency, prevent occlusive disease, or for other medical purposes, such as to hold embolization devices in place. Further, the features described in the embodiments can be applied to balloon-expanded stents made from malleable or formable materials and intended to be expanded inside a suitable body lumen. The features described in the embodiments can also be applied to bare metal stents, stents made from other than metallic materials, stents with or without coatings intended for such purposes as dispensing a medicament or preventing disease processes, and stents where some or all of the components (e.g., struts, bridges, paddles) of the stents are bio-degradable or bio-resorbable.

The embodiments use the example of a 6 mm self-expanding stent, but can be applied with equal merit to other kinds of stents and stents of other sizes. Specifically, stents for use in peripheral arteries are customarily made in outer diameters ranging from 3 mm to 12 mm, and in lengths from 10 mm to 200 mm. Stents of larger and smaller diameters and lengths can also be made accordingly. Also, stents embodying the features of the embodiments can be used in other arteries, veins, the biliary system, esophagus, trachea, and other body lumens.

While the present invention has been disclosed with reference to certain embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it has the full scope defined by the language of the following claims, and equivalents thereof. 

1. (canceled)
 2. An implantable prosthesis comprising: a continuous helical winding having a plurality of circumferential sections circumscribing a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube, the circumferential sections being spaced apart along the axis; and at least one bridge configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section, each circumferential section having undulations disposed about the tube, the undulations having at least one segment connected to the bridge where the at least one segment has a length greater than a length of other segments unconnected to the bridge.
 3. An implantable prosthesis comprising: a continuous helical winding having a plurality of circumferential sections circumscribing a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube, the circumferential sections being spaced apart along the axis, each circumferential section having undulations disposed about the tube, each undulation defined by an intersection of two segments that form an vertex; and at least one bridge configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section, the at least one bridge connected to the adjacent undulations at respective locations other than the vertices of the adjacent undulations.
 4. An implantable prosthesis comprising: a continuous helical winding having a plurality of circumferential sections circumscribing a longitudinal axis from a first end to a second end to define a tube, the circumferential sections being spaced apart along the axis; at least one bridge configured to connect one circumferential section to an axially-spaced adjacent circumferential section, the at least one bridge extending on a plane generally orthogonal with respect to the axis; and at least one annular ring connected to one of the first and second ends of the continuous helical winding. 5-7. (canceled)
 8. The implantable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the bridge comprises a minimum width greater than a width of any segments that define the undulations. 9-18. (canceled)
 19. The implantable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein at least one generally rectangular marker is connected to a circumferential section proximate one of the first and second ends, the rectangular marker having its length extending generally parallel to the axis and its width is greater than two times the width of any strut segments of the undulations.
 20. (canceled)
 21. The implantable prosthesis of claim 2, wherein the width of the at least one strut segment is approximately 80% of a width of a bridge.
 22. The implantable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein a ratio of a number of struts about one circumferential section to a strut length in inches being greater than 800 per inch.
 23. The implantable prosthesis according to claim 22, wherein said ratio is greater than 1000 per inch. 24-25. (canceled)
 26. The implantable prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein a number of struts in one circumferential section of the helical winding are between 36 and
 58. 27. The implantable prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein a first number of struts between any two bridges in a first direction along the helical winding of a circumferential section is equal to a second number of struts between any two bridges in a second direction opposite the first along the circumferential section of the helical winding.
 28. The implantable prosthesis according claim 27, wherein the first number is selected from a group consisting of 3, 5, 7, and 9, and the second number is selected from a group consisting of 3, 5, 7, and
 9. 29. (canceled)
 30. The implantable prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein a first number of struts between any two bridges in a first direction along the helical winding of a circumferential section is not equal to a second number of struts between any two bridges in a second direction opposite the first along the circumferential section of the helical winding.
 31. The implantable prosthesis according claim 30, wherein the first number is selected from a group consisting of 3, 5, 7, and 9, and the second number is selected from a group consisting of 3, 5, 7, and
 9. 32. The implantable prosthesis according to claim 31, wherein the first number is equal to five and the second number is equal to seven.
 33. The implantable prosthesis according to claim 31, wherein the first number is equal to three and the second number is equal to five. 34-36. (canceled) 